Back
Medication Errors and Patient Safety Concerns

The US Senate directed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to lead a national effort to improve patient safety and prevent medical errors. A number of projects were funded. The interim report (2003) to the Senate identified 8 common root causes of medical errors. These identified causes have served as guides in efforts to eliminate errors:

Eight common causes of medical errors

1. Communication These are the most common problems and
problems cause the widest variety of errors at all levels
of patient care.
2. Inadequate information This includes problems that prevent timely
flow availability of information, such as laboratory
findings, and coordination of medication
orders.
3. Human problems These include lack of knowledge, failure to
follow procedures or standards of care, and
sub-optimal documentation/labeling.
4. Patient-related These include improper patient identification,
problems failure to obtain informed consent, and
inadequate patient education.
5. Organizational transfer This includes inadequacy in training or
of knowledge education for those providing care, including
procedures in place for an institution or unit.
6. Staffing pattern /work This includes inadequate staffing and
flow supervision.
7. Technical failure This includes equipment failure, poor
equipment design, and inadequate instruction
in use of equipment.
8. Inadequate policies These include failure in processes of care as
and procedures well as poorly documented, non-existing, or
inadequate procedures.

Identification

The first goal that the Joint Commission outlines is a patient-related problem:

“Improve                    cytheofpatientaccuraidentificationrequires.” 2Thepatient guidelin

identifiers. Identifying the patient seems central to providing care, but failing to properly identify patients is the cause of many errors, sometimes resulting in the wrong patients having operations or receiving treatments or tests intended for someone else. One in-depth study used root-cause analysis to determine why the wrong patient, Joan Morris, underwent an invasive cardiac procedure intended for Jane Morrison. The study identified not one error, but 17 different and distinct errors, beginning with an original confusion in identification. Once this error had been made, the assumption, from one department to another, was that the woman was the correct patient—despite a different name, different

diagnosis, the patient’s statement that she knew n and didn’t wantnd nothesignedprocedure,consentform.Infact, shea was

convinced to sign a consent form—although clearly without “in because the test was totally unrelated to her condition. Repeatedly, Morris was referred to as “the patient”hanbyname. Evenorwhen“mystaff patient” noticed disparities, such as the difference from the laboratory schedule, they assumed there was an explanation.

There are a number of steps that staff must take in order to assure that patients are correctly identified. It is not sufficient to just glance at a wristband as one can look without actually seeing when procedures become routine.

Correctly identifying a patient

Always use two patient identifiers—usually name and birth date.

Ask the patient when possible, “What is your name?” date?”

Always check the wristband or another form of identification to verify identification, and read the name out loud.

Never assume that “knowing”identification patienortha right to ignore identification procedures.

Never trust other people to have correctly identified a patient.

Use names to identify patients, not others do this,.“DoSmithyou inmeanroomMr 86?”

Verify identification every single time for every single treatment or procedure.

Conduct – out”a“timebefore any —invasivefinalverification toproc confirm the right patient, the right treatment/procedure, the right site—using

active communication techniques.

0% Complete